Contribute news or contact us by sending an email to: RCTonline@gmail.com

Wednesday, April 8, 2015

What Are Those Shells?

Paleo-biology of the Bear Lake Basin, Utah
Photo by Laurianne Wakefield

Laurianne Wakefield writes: "We’ve come across these mounds of shells on the beaches of Bear Lake.  You can bury your feet in them and I’ve learned they have an interesting history."

“Many ancient clam and snail shells have been found around the shoreline of Bear
Lake. Local residents have at times gathered the shells as a source of calcium for
their chickens. These shells are well preserved and have been dated to be 10,000
years old (Smart, 1963).

Curators at the Smithsonian Institute identified all 6
species of snail and one species of clam. Carbon dating performed by Columbia  University estimated shells gathered from the Ideal Beach area of Bear Lake to be  12,000 years old.”
To read more, click here.

I had no idea Bear Lake had such an interesting history.
Authors: \

 

Letter To The Editor: Swan Creek

Response to Letters To The Editor:  Swan Creek Garbage Pickup Problems

April 13, 2015.  I now understand the adage "It is difficult to unring a bell once it's been rung."  A week ago I reported on a discussion before the Rich County Commissioners regarding the garbage pickup area at Swan Creek Village.  Since that article was published I received several calls and have been involved in discussions with people, all of whom were upset in one way or another by what they felt I said had been discussed at the meeting.  Surprisingly no one seemed to be upset with me, only at the situation they apparently thought my article implied.

Even though what I had written was intended to be a very short and simple explanation of a discussion that took place over more than a half an hour, some understood different things from the article than others and came away feeling that what I said either supported or lacked to support something that had already been in the air and simmering.  So in an attempt to clarify what I thought I was saying, let me try once again.

Those making the presentation from the Swan Creek Village said that the person on whose property the garbage pickup area now sits had suggested that the garbage pickup area be moved from its current location to a different area of his property (a fact I erroneously forgot to include in my previous article).  While the Swan Creek Village representatives appreciated the offer, their preference would be to move the garbage pickup area to property the HOA owned so they could provide permanent upgrades to the area in a manner that would improve its usability.  Their request to the County that they be allowed to move the area a little further from the entrance and a ways up the hill did not work for Rich County, however, because their policy is that a garbage pickup area for a private subdivision is to be located near the entrance to the subdivision, and in a place where the garbage trucks are not required to drive up a hill, an issue that exists because of hazards resulting from winter driving conditions.  The County did say that they might be able to allow the move just during the summer period to give the County and the HOA a little time to work out a solution that would satisfy both the HOA and the County Policy.

My apologies for any confusion that may have resulted from my previous article.

Bob Stevens

Letters To The Editor: Swan Creek HOA

April 7, 2015 1:30 PM
To the Editor

Apparently, the representatives from Swan Creek Village HOA were less than fully candid with the Commissioners, when the truth is the HOA refused to even negotiate with the landowner when he proposed relocating the collection area 200 feet north of the current location and enclosing the area with a fence in keeping with the rustic rural architecture that is written into the Swan Creek regulations.

The only entrance to Swan Creek has for many years been living with an ugly white vinyl enclosure with doors falling off hinges, the back wall broken out for months, whole sections being held together with ratchet straps, and snow removal non-existent.

The "temporary" but costly relocation to the cul-de-sac at the west end of Mackinaw is a really BAD idea. The road is too narrow for the garbage truck and cars to pass one another; the turn around area is not a full circle; the vehicles leaving can no longer drag trailers along as they dump, but rather will have to make 2 extra trips along Mackinaw to dump while raising dust, creating a noisy nuisance for the 4 year round residents and 8 built-out lots, not to mention the smells, spills, and fire hazards at the dumpsters reducing property values.

I know the landowner (of the current site) has been generous to a fault with Swan Creek for over 10 years, and he is not even a part of the Association, but just a good neighbor who is under-appreciated and certainly not deserving of the damage to his reputation that these untruthful Board decisions are foisting on him.

James J Wise
Swan Creek

To The Editor:  Another Letter Re: Swan Creek


I was at this meeting representing Swan Creek Village. The sentence in Mr. Stevens article stating "The current property owner, however, wants to put the property to another use and is not willing to renew the lease for the current property past the end of April." is incorrect. The current lessor offered Swan Creek Village a new lease, Swan Creek Village declined. Swan Creek Village currently wants to own its garbage site.
Swan Creek Village is appreciative of the Lessor.  We have done business together for many years as his tenant and I feel it appropriate that the details of the meeting be reported correctly. Out of respect for the lessor I ask that this correction be made and published in RCT next issue.

Thank you,
Mike Capron

Sunday, April 5, 2015

The Unmuddled Mathematician


Mush
By Chris Coray, The Unmuddled Mathematician

The world is a different place in almost all ways than when I was a kid.  I am old enough to remember the daily visits to our house by the ice truck, from which the ice man brought a very large block of ice, using tongs, and put it in our ice box (now called a refrigerator).   It was soon replaced by the primitive form of modern equipment we all now pretty much take for granted.   But almost all the food was prepared in the kitchen by my mother.  Most all of it was really good and had pretty much fresh, as opposed to frozen, ingredients. 

There were, however, a few foods that gave me trouble.  First, there was the daily bowl of mush for breakfast.  It’s a bad name for a bad dish.  This was not boxed cereal with pictures of popular sports figures on the outside.  No, this was a substance that served two purposes.  First, it was the essential ingredient in concrete, albeit with less sand, but if you let it set up (about an hour) it was fine for house foundations.  The other use was in my breakfast bowl.  It sort of looked like the tip of the iceberg seen by the Titanic, with the berg surrounded by a little milk.  The dialog went something like this.   Me, “Mom, I hate this stuff.  It tastes exactly like it looks.”  My mother, “Eat it, it’s good for you, it will stick to your ribs.”  Me, “My ribs are already cemented together and I can’t breathe.”  Mother, “Eat your mush.”  On a final and somewhat positive note I had to develop enormously strong mouth, throat, and esophageal muscles to get a spoonful of this concoction into my stomach.  I don’t think the Heimlich maneuver would have had a chance on a stuck chunk.

It was that or starve.   I would have paid for Cheerios.  There was no menu from which to choose.  A couple of other items from our never changing menu included an occasional dish of liver and onions.  It made me sick to look at it, smell it, and was even worse when I tried to eat it.  I would complain, “I will gag if I try to eat this”.  My dad, who loved liver and onions, answered, “If you gag I will give you a reason to gag”.  Parenthetically I note that it can be proved that liver and duck are the same substance. 

My family (before Bobbie) pretty much ate a fixed set of dishes.  For example, every Sunday and I mean every Sunday, we had roast beef, potatoes, and peas.  While I love fresh peas it is well known that cooking a pea turns it into a botulism filled organism with bad taste.  Part of our marriage vows included the “No cooked peas clause”.   And the meat was always well done, to please my dad.  Well, well, well done.  When he cut a piece with the world’s sharpest knife or a small chainsaw, it hit the plate like a silver dollar, rattling for 15 seconds as it settled down to level.  You couldn’t distinguish it from shoe leather.  Jerky is softer.  I was 20 years old before I learned of medium rare meat, a liberating moment. 

We also ate a variety of dishes made from leftovers.  The names included hash, goulash, and gubervarsh.  Yes, I know that last is not a word, but that’s what we called it.  As children of the depression, that event produced an absolutely-no-waste lifestyle in my parents.  Fair enough, too.  But pot-gut (ground squirrel) kebab would beat some of the entrees.  To be fair, the food was mostly good and we would about once a week in warm weather make homemade ice cream, my brother and I taking turns on the crank (no motors).  But in our model of never changing consistency we always made just one flavor, pineapple sherbet, again favored by my father.  And the turkey at thanksgiving, fresh, not frozen, was just wonderful, even with fairly dry dressing.

We have recently travelled to Spain, Germany, and Mexico.  They have better food than the U.S.  It is fresher, more flavorful, has more fruits and vegetables.  If we continue to export McDonalds, Burger King, KFC, and the like we will eventually kill inhabitants of countries who buy into those franchise fast food.  On the other hand, we do have one incredible place at Bear Lake to feast on food that is delicious beyond description.  It’s called Elvira’s.

Snow Still In Mountains

Photo by Heather L. Moldenhauer