Contribute news or contact us by sending an email to: RCTonline@gmail.com

Thursday, June 4, 2015

Garden City P&Z Meeting

Anita Weston, Reporter
Rich Civic Times 

GARDEN CITY, Utah  June 3 2014.  A public hearing was held prior to the Planning Commission’s regular meeting.  

The Regular Planning Commission Meeting was opened.  The height limit for beach front properties is 25’ and all other buildings are 35’.  The rationale for these heights is to prevent taller buildings from blocking lake views.  This height limit includes cupolas and other decorative structures that may be added to roofs.  A motion was made and passed to accept  Ordinance #15-22. 

The Commission members discussed combining residential estate and agricultural zones.  Currently there are differences between the two zones concerning set backs, and how the zones are regulated.   The item was tabled until next month while determinations are made concerning these differences that currently exist between these two ordinances.

It was noted that there are 336 nightly rentals within the City limits.  An ordinance has been written that will not allow short term rentals to advertise on their property.  It was noted that with that many rentals, there would be signs everywhere if advertising signs were allowed.  Many individuals like to place a name on their home.  It was decided that such a sign could be used but can’t be any larger than a real estate sign—two feet by two feet.  

Ordinance #15-24, an ordinance stating that Short Term Rentals cannot advertise on their property was passed with the understanding that small signs containing a name would be allowed.

Parking requirements were discussed.  Many individuals feel that the number of parking spaces is too high.  Currently the number of parking spots required by the ordinance is ten.  Parking is a problem, and the City has created several parking lots to making more parking readily available to visitors.  It was suggested that perhaps the number should be lowered.  However, if it is to be lowered, it should be a requirement that the parking must be asphalted and marked. 


Currently, many businesses have a large area for parking; but because it is not developed, people hesitate to park there, or they take up several spaces with their boats and the angle they use when parking.  Undeveloped parking is often not kept neat and cared for thus giving a negative picture of the City.   Several ideas and suggestions were made.  It was determined that this item will be discussed again next month. 

No comments: