By Paul Rolly, Tribune Columnist
Published: October 8, 2013 10:36PM
Could the Utah
attorney general’s office just be consistent?
"Bobbie Coray — former economic development director and
Chamber of Commerce president for Cache County, former state liquor
commissioner and one-time congressional candidate — finally decided to get into
an honest profession seven years ago.
She became a journalist, juggling numerous civic
minded-projects with that noble First Amendment endeavor in her newly adopted
home town of Garden City on the shores of Bear Lake, just to stay busy in
semi-retirement.
Having a history as a Democrat in Republican northern Utah,
she quickly made waves.
After years as a bureaucrat and policymaker, she found
herself on the other side of the ledger, trying to find out what our stellar
elected leaders are doing.
But, alas, the eager cub reporter for the Rich County Times
weekly newspaper found that she and other probing journalists were locked out
of staff meetings that preceded the public County Commission meetings, even
though all three Rich County commissioners, all the other county elected
officials and their paid aides were present.
She filed a formal complaint, alleging county officials were
violating Utah’s open-meetings laws.
She won.
The Utah attorney general’s office compelled the Rich County
Commission to open those meetings.
A few months later, though, the Rich County attorney’s office convinced the attorney general’s office that Rich was too small to be required to open staff meetings — even though Garden City’s even smaller meetings strictly follow the law and let in reporters and the public.
So for the past six years, Coray and her little band of
First Amendment backers have sat outside the closed Rich County meetings.
Then, about a month ago, the attorney general’s office sent
two attorneys to the Rich County Commission to discuss a water issue. When they
asked the reporters why they were sitting outside the staff meeting and were
told the media and the public couldn’t attend because they were closed
sessions, the attorney general’s lawyers lectured the journalists on the law
and said they had every right to be inside.
The attorneys were aghast that the reporters didn’t know
that — until they were told it was the attorney general’s office’s ruling that
kept them out."
© Copyright 2013 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
ED Note: Maybe we should try again to open our County Commission meetings now that the AG's office is being looked at more carefully? We like being called a "little band of First Amendment backers"! The Constitution is very careful to protect the press in efforts to report on government.
Joey Stocking of Garden City, alerted us to this article and said:
ED Note: Maybe we should try again to open our County Commission meetings now that the AG's office is being looked at more carefully? We like being called a "little band of First Amendment backers"! The Constitution is very careful to protect the press in efforts to report on government.
Joey Stocking of Garden City, alerted us to this article and said:
"You are absolutely right, Bobbie, that those staff meetings should be public. What does size of the county have to do with anything? What does the county need to hide from the public in these meetings? I do understand the reasons why a meeting can sometimes be closed to the public, but that list is very short. For those interested here are the reasons a public meeting can be closed: http://le.utah.gov/ code/TITLE52/htm/52_04_020500. htm
The county must state the reason they are closing the meetings. What is the reason stated for these meetings being closed? "
No comments:
Post a Comment