2020 Schedule
·
Construction
o Most
businesses still busy running into Fall
o
Father’s Day weekend (2nd week of June) is start of busy season
o Spring
Timeframe – April 1st – June 15th
Project
Understanding
·
500-600 boats launching at marina
o
But use different points of access of parking
·
Launch ramp is the bottleneck (7 lanes)
·
Public launch ramp (200 boats) 5-miles south
·
Temporary 356 boat buoys
·
Recreation at marina – beach area on north side
(100s of people)
o It
is increasing the traffic into the marina (non-boat related)
·
People park on the side of the road to go to the
beach north of marina
o No
designated parking
·
173 additional parking in expansion
·
Still be functioning even if marina is expanded
o
Bridge and expansion would increase business
o
As well as bike
path
·
Possibility to do pedestrian bridge?
o No
pedestrian zones but people walking across to hill parking is a problem
o
Bike path terminates at hill / overflow parking
o
40mph along corner southbound
o
Budget and justification issue
§
Compliant regulations
o Maybe
a marina operation – additional funding
§
State Parks Access Grant ($500k)
o
Chamber/business community show desire for guests
and locals to get signatures for bridge proposal
§ Cost
of bridge – estimated $500k
§
Legislature – additional funding outside UDOT
o
Safety of the harbor is main priority – getting
out of the open water
Concept Designs
·
Wetland mitigation (established)
o
Asking if we can build over wetlands on west
side of 89 because they were essentially manmade
·
On the west side, north of entrance to overflow
parking is a wet spring
Concept 1
· Crosswalk at Raspberry Square intersection?
o
Create too much foot traffic?
o
Need a sidewalk to get them to the marina
o
Some kind of pedestrian crossing is necessary
·
Left turn lane at Raspberry Square to Harbor Village
o
Timeline of harbor village entrance expansion
o
Highest left turn lane into harbor village
·
Easier coming out of the north end – can see
better around the bend
o Alleviated
the traffic of outbound using north exit
·
Exit only on the north might create issues
towards the entry
o Eliminate
the whole exit in the middle?
·
In-bound and out-bound (seasonal changes) can be difficult
o
Mental switch can be difficult safety issue
·
Remove the roundabout?
·
North exit might be best?
Concept 2
·
No comments, majority prefer the double lane
Name
|
Organization
|
Matt Coombs
|
Utah Forestry, Fire &
State Lands
|
Zac
Covington
|
Bear
River Association of Governments (BRAG)
|
Brian
Carver
|
Bear
River Association of Governments (BRAG)
|
Richard
Droesbeke
|
State
Parks / DFCM
|
Mike Leonhardt
|
Garden City Mayor
|
Tami Leonhardt
|
Bear Lake Convention and
Visitors Bureau
|
Mark Smoot
|
Harbor Village
|
Bill
Cox
|
Rich
County Commissioner
|
Howard
Pope
|
Garden
City Council
|
Cory
Doolin
|
WorldMark
|
Kathy Anderson
|
RTC Online
|
Rose Noorda
|
Bear Lake Valley Chamber of
Commerce
|
David Cottle
|
Bear Lake Watch
|
Claudia
Cottle
|
Bear
Lake Watch
|
Brady
Roberts
|
UDOT
Project Manager
|
Chris
Price
|
Consultant
Team
|
Kathryn Floor
|
Consultant Team
|
Laura Ingersoll
|
Consultant Team
|
No comments:
Post a Comment